login

Search documents

Browse topics

Document details

 
Title:
 
Optimized Orientation and Proportion of Transparent Components Based on the Least Annual Heat Demand
 
Author(s):
 
A. Rahmani, R. Wagner
 
Keywords:
 
Photovoltaics, Solar Architecture, Zero-Energy Building, Architectural Optimization, Heating Demand, Architectural Pattern, Passive Solar Strategies
 
Topic:
 
PV Systems - Performance, Applications and Integration
Subtopic: Building, Infrastructure, Landscape and Other Applications of PV
Event: 35th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition
Session: 6BV.1.38
 
Pages:
 
1809 - 1817
ISBN: 3-936338-50-7
Paper DOI: 10.4229/35thEUPVSEC20182018-6BV.1.38
 
Price:
 
 
0,00 EUR
 
Document(s): paper, poster
 

Abstract/Summary:


Transparent components influence every passive house based on their surface proportion compared to opaque surfaces and their main orientation. These components have to provide appropriative potential of sunlight absorption to deliver a considerable proportion of heat demand to building. On the other hand, to reach to an optimized passive house, that be capable in parallel to perform also as a “Zero Energy Building” (ZEB), the very first decision is minimizing total energy demand of building. So, in the very elementary steps of designing of a building it is crucial to include passive strategies to minimize energy demands. These modifications should be applied in the first steps of architectural designing of building and is much wider than only proportion of windows in relation to volumetric and geometrical characteristics of buildings. Based on enormous economic and technical limitations, there is also an unavoidable need to implement photovoltaics or solar thermal panels to compensate the energy demand that passive strategies integrated in buildings are not able to fulfill alone. An accurate implementation of PVs again argues a certain amount of surrounding building’s skin and consequently an accurate calculation of the surfaces that should be allocated to PVs is necessary [1]. Also, different geometric proportions result different available surfaces in different orientations for PV integration that influence the final capacity of power plant. In this step, the crucial question is “which one is in priority for geometrical modification of a building? Passive strategies or PV integration?” In this work, a simple architectural prototype has been evaluated to assess the specific effect of its windows in different orientations. Also, in every orientation, different forms of the same building have been examined to compare the effect of envelop area factor and different “Treated Floor Area” (TFA). So, four architectural variants with the same volumetric amount, but with different TFAs and different geometrical proportions have been developed. The main target of theses comparisons is to assess the annual heat demand of the variants. Also, it would clarify the influence of orientation of windows to reach to different heat demands. In parallel, it would show the effect of different forms of a building with the same orientation and the same surface of transparent surfaces to reach to different heat demands. Design-PH, has been used to determine heat losses and heat gains of these prototypes in different situations. So, in each variant four different parameters have been measured that are; “heat loss of opaque surfaces & thermal bridges”, “heat loss of windows”, “ventilation heat loss” and “Solar heat gain of windows”. The effect of “ventilation heat loss” has been ignored as it always has the same amount in the entire variants with regard to the constant amounts of transparent surfaces. The main principle of the software clarifies the annual heat demand with regard to the difference between the total heat losses and total heat gains. To conclude the final criteria, four different variants have been developed; the entire variants have the same volume of 800 m3 to do the final comparisons fairly. Every variant has been assessed when its windows has been looking toward south, west, north and east. So, sixteen different sub-variants have been calculated and compared to each other. U-values of windows, roof and the ceiling of variants has not been modified as the characteristic of materials has not been topic of this work. In the second part of theses simulations to assess performance of these variants for integration of PVs, available surfaces of these four variants have been emerged. For emphasis on effect of the main direction of windows, in each variant there is only one facade holding 5 squad windows with a total area of 20 m2. The effect of main orientation of building has been taken into account, so as subdivision of main variants, they are divided also to south-faced, west-faced, northfaced and east-faced variants. Additionally,